Anna Watkinson-Powell studied on the Master of Public Health (MPH) programme at ScHARR, 2012-2013. Anna opted to take a year out of her undergraduate medical degree to study on the MPH programme because of her interest in public health, particularly around the role of doctors in prevention and health policy. Anna believes that the MPH provided her with invaluable skills for her future career as a doctor including critical appraisal, research skills and academic writing. The knowledge she gained around topics such as health promotion, health economics and health systems and policy were both fascinating and useful for a career as a doctor hopefully involved in research, commissioning health services and health policy. Anna is currently completing her medical studies.
Anna's dissertation was a qualitative research project for the Food Futures team within Manchester City Council. This involved interviewing home care workers about their experiences of providing food and support with eating to older people receiving care in their own homes.
Watch the video below of Anna talking about her research project.
The title of Anna's project was Food provision for older people receiving home care from the perspectives of home-care workers. Along with her co-authors, Sarah Barnes, Melanie Lovatt, Anna Wasielewska and Barbara Drummond, Anna has recently published her paper in Health and Social Care in the Community.
Citation: Watkinson-Powell, A., Barnes, S., Lovatt, M., Wasielewska A. and Drummond, B. (2104) Food provision for older people receiving home care from the perspectives of home-care workers. Health and Social Care in the Community. 22 (5): 553-560.
The ScHARR Student e-Journal is an online departmental journal where Masters and PhD students at the School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, can publish their work.
Socio-ecological determinants of dietary behaviour among Ghanaian women living in the UK
Hibbah Saeed is in the first year of studying for a PhD at the School of Health and Related Research. Her project work is about the socio-ecological determinants of dietary behaviour among Ghanaian women living in the UK. Prior to starting her PhD, Hibbah worked as a research assistant at the Nutrition Department of Noguchi Medical Institute, Ghana where she provided support to research work. Hibbah has also recently graduated from Ghent University in Belgium (Masters in Nutrition and Rural Development) with a distinction. Alongside her studies, Hibbah is working as a research assistant on an EU project called DEDIPAC. She hopes, at the end of her PhD, to have gained the necessary skills and expertise to be able to be an expert in her subject, and to contribute to the field of public health nutrition.
You can view Hibbah's research profile by clicking this link.
Click this link to view a poster about Hibbah's research to date: Socio-ecological determinants of dietary behaviour among Ghanaian women living in the UK.
The interplay between global public private partnerships (GPPPs) and national contexts: A case study of the Global Fund’s Country Coordinating Mechanism (CCM) in Ethiopia
Henock B. Taddese is a PhD Student and Teaching Assistant at ScHARR. He is a graduate of the Europubhealth masters course (EPH), which is a programme jointly run by ScHARR, Copenhagen University in Denmark and EHESP School of Public Health in France. Henock has worked for several years coordinating and advising community health and HIV/AIDS prevention and control programmes in Uganda, and his home country, Ethiopia.
The title of Henock's research project is The interplay between global public private partnerships (GPPPs) and national contexts: A case study of the Global Fund’s Country Coordinating Mechanism (CCM) in Ethiopia. You can also view a presentation about his work by clicking on this link.
Abstract
Background: Global Public Private Partnerships (GPPPs) are flourishing in the global health governance landscape as a modality for mobilising and managing resources to accelerate attainment of global health targets. The mechanisms are generally viewed favourably as they are widely thought to have desirable effects of enhancing multi-sectoral engagement and deliberative decision-making. However, there is lack of understanding of how they work in real-life, especially in developing country contexts.
Study Aim and Theoretical Framework: This study sets out to explore the interaction between GPPPs and the national ‘context’ in developing countries. The study adopts a theoretical lens, which conceptualises the interaction between social actors and ‘context’ as constituting a dialectical relationship (dynamic interaction) between actors, institutions and deep-lying contextual factors.
Methods: I undertook a case study of the country coordinating mechanism (CCM) of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM) in Ethiopia. This is a qualitative study employing in-depth interviews with forty-four policy makers, non-participant observation of CCM meetings and documents’ analysis. Data collected through the different methods were analysed interpretively whereby critical themes or ‘story lines’ about actors’ interactions in the CCM are interpreted in relation to relevant institutional and contextual factors.
Findings: The critical themes or ‘story lines’ that dominate actors’ interactions in the CCM include: Consensus and compromises to safeguard the national interest; priority of clinical care over community based interventions; actors’ perceptions of each other (A public sector that gets its way, a timid civil society, a cautious donor community, and a private sector missing in action); and the ‘effective system’ argument. The pertinent institutional factors in relation to these themes include adopted rules and norms, such as: Decision through consensus, partnership, country ownership, performance based funding, zero tolerance to fraud, and composition of the CCM. The relevant contextual factors constitute: The nature of the Ethiopian State; history of AIDS in Ethiopia; poverty alleviation/development as a political pledge; legal frameworks for regulating civil society; CSOs’ representation and coordination crisis; and the processes in which national strategic plans are formulated in the country.
Implications of study: By exploring how the identified critical ideas and narratives relate to institutional and contextual factors, the study adds to the meagre understanding of the ‘embeddedness’ of such globally designed mechanisms in national contexts.
The title of Henock's research project is The interplay between global public private partnerships (GPPPs) and national contexts: A case study of the Global Fund’s Country Coordinating Mechanism (CCM) in Ethiopia. You can also view a presentation about his work by clicking on this link.
Abstract
Background: Global Public Private Partnerships (GPPPs) are flourishing in the global health governance landscape as a modality for mobilising and managing resources to accelerate attainment of global health targets. The mechanisms are generally viewed favourably as they are widely thought to have desirable effects of enhancing multi-sectoral engagement and deliberative decision-making. However, there is lack of understanding of how they work in real-life, especially in developing country contexts.
Study Aim and Theoretical Framework: This study sets out to explore the interaction between GPPPs and the national ‘context’ in developing countries. The study adopts a theoretical lens, which conceptualises the interaction between social actors and ‘context’ as constituting a dialectical relationship (dynamic interaction) between actors, institutions and deep-lying contextual factors.
Methods: I undertook a case study of the country coordinating mechanism (CCM) of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM) in Ethiopia. This is a qualitative study employing in-depth interviews with forty-four policy makers, non-participant observation of CCM meetings and documents’ analysis. Data collected through the different methods were analysed interpretively whereby critical themes or ‘story lines’ about actors’ interactions in the CCM are interpreted in relation to relevant institutional and contextual factors.
Findings: The critical themes or ‘story lines’ that dominate actors’ interactions in the CCM include: Consensus and compromises to safeguard the national interest; priority of clinical care over community based interventions; actors’ perceptions of each other (A public sector that gets its way, a timid civil society, a cautious donor community, and a private sector missing in action); and the ‘effective system’ argument. The pertinent institutional factors in relation to these themes include adopted rules and norms, such as: Decision through consensus, partnership, country ownership, performance based funding, zero tolerance to fraud, and composition of the CCM. The relevant contextual factors constitute: The nature of the Ethiopian State; history of AIDS in Ethiopia; poverty alleviation/development as a political pledge; legal frameworks for regulating civil society; CSOs’ representation and coordination crisis; and the processes in which national strategic plans are formulated in the country.
Implications of study: By exploring how the identified critical ideas and narratives relate to institutional and contextual factors, the study adds to the meagre understanding of the ‘embeddedness’ of such globally designed mechanisms in national contexts.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)